Home    

Indie Artists Song Critiques / reviews

Watch Live Watch Live Watch Live Watch Live Watch Live Watch Live
   
Live
Webcast
Music
Videos
Music &
Films
News &
Dates
New
Entries
Featured
Artist

Critiques  Request a Song Critique
 
 
 

Artist name: Minster Hill; Song title: "Anymore"

Since 1997 Minster Hill in it's various line-ups and variation has been slowly releasing earth-challenging music.

Visit Artist' site for this and other songs: MinsterHill.com; Song Lyrics

 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

 

Add Comment  
Name:
Country:
Link: http://
Comment:
  Read Comments  

Read Readers' Comments

Minster Hill
Minster Hill
Web site

More Minster Hill:

  More MSSVision  
 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Minster Hill -> Minster Hill

"Anymore" is a pleasant to listen and sing along song. The melodies and harmonies are graciously mixed into a colorful mosaic of mild sounds and emotions.

As you listen thru the lines, you'll enjoy the polite performance - both instrumental and vocal. Overall, the song shows very good songwriting and originally executed ideas.

However, there are a few concerns that could arise from a track "time oriented" point of view. I could not define "Anymore" as a contemporary/modern tune. Lyrics, melodies, and harmonies are just fine, but together they form a "time stamp" dated some years back.

Let's examine why this is happening.

The most striking reason why a song may or may not sound dated is the arrangement. The arrangement is what turns a song from classical to rock, or brings it from the 30's to the 90's or the next century. In this case I would see this track on the shelves of the late 80's or early 90's music. Again, it has a potential Hit- major sound, but let's try bring it to nowadays!

For an arrangement with a contemporary sound, I would suggest that you:
1. get rid of the brass section; and
2. instead of the processed guitars use an acoustic, slightly distorted, or both; and
3. get rid of the textures: the guitar melodies/arpeggi in Chorus, and the organ rhythmic chords on "I got a wife" (this one is nice but not convincing).

- I don't think you need the brass section. It is well thought and performed, but it is what reminds of the commercial rock hits of the late 80's and prevents the song from having a fresh look.
- If you use a raw guitar sound - acoustic or slightly distorted, this will immediately position the song on the list of the contemporary tracks. During the years the trends in processing guitar sound have differed significantly, what has always been the same is the clean guitar. Also, instead of the melodic/arpeggi textures you could use some riffs in the lower register.

If you are willing to experiment, you could try substituting the brass with a muted trumpet and the organ with a piano - that would bring the sound close to a pop style.

Another factor that positions "Anymore" a few years back is the performance. Again, if you are not aiming at commercial stations format - it is OK! Otherwise you could revise end of phrases such as (see italic):
- I got a wife/ I got a lover/ I got a wife/ who’s got a lover.
- the choir on Chorus is soooo much Beatles - good or bad?
In the above cases use straight notes for a closer to rock sound; or just accentuate the ornamentations for a pop sound.

Besides the contemporary sound concern, another element deserving comments is the song structure.
I'm not sure whether "There’s a girl whose woman..." and "Give one last look to.." are Verse 1 and 2, or they are two different Verses (one and another one). They have different melodies and harmonies, though nice, so it's not the same Verse. But the second one does not seem to be a bridge, or pre-chorus, or ...verse. So what is it?

Furthermore, there appear to be 3 guitar solos in this track. Are all of them needed? Certainly no! Contemporary radio stations will hardly accept one solo, and often they will prefer a harmonically performed rhythm. So get rid of the other (you choose which one) two solos and prune the song structure.

These concerns apart, I cannot but praise the originality of songwriting and the good taste about choice and arrangement of instruments.

Good Luck,
Anton Tontchev
for MSSVision.com - Sep/4/04

 | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |

 

Comments  

 


Facebook | Subscribe:
Copyright 2001-2010 . MSSVision.com . e-mail
Site Map - Advertise - Help - About - Privacy | Fans - Music Video Submissions - Music Industry Links

This site contains materials protected by International Copyright Laws.
Any unauthorized use is prohibited and will not be tolerated.